2
What’s the difference between:
.figure-box>figure>img{
width: 440px;
position: relative;
}
To:
.figure-box figure img{
max-width: 100%;
position: relative;
transition: transform 0.6s;
}
2
What’s the difference between:
.figure-box>figure>img{
width: 440px;
position: relative;
}
To:
.figure-box figure img{
max-width: 100%;
position: relative;
transition: transform 0.6s;
}
0
.A>.B>.C
will select C who is B’s immediate son who is A’s immediate son
.A .B .C
will select C and B for any offspring
0
The difference is that with the >
means that the Elemental has to be direct child, for ex:
<div class="figure-box">
<div><div><div><div>
<figure>
<div>
<img src=""/>
</div>
</figure>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
For this HTML tree, the .figure-box figure img
, but the .figure-box > figure > img
, for the figure
is not the direct son of .figure-box
And for selector without >
, this condition of direct child is independent
Browser other questions tagged html css html5 css3 responsive-layout
You are not signed in. Login or sign up in order to post.
I asked a question about selectors, and one of the doubts was this, see.
– Marconi
Related
– Roknauta