Vinicius, as an alternative, you can use the Attributo [DataContract]
and [DataMember]
in place of [JsonObject]
and [JsonProperty]
respectively.
But in doing so, you’ll have to put [DataMember]
in all properties you want to serialize, once you omit the [DataMember]
will be the same as adding a [JsonIgnore]
.
This approach can be quite useful if you want to expose your objects through a WebAPI
or WCF
, including the [DataMember]
has the attribute EmitDefaultValue
, if set to false, it will not serialize properties while having the value default
.
But know if you have how to declare the name of the property in a way that does not use Attributes
, unfortunately you will have to write your own JsonConverter
, then maybe it’s not feasible.
if you prefer, you can add the attributes in other class, to make it use the Attributo [MetadataType]
, this approach is especially useful for maintaining attributes in automatically generated classes, so let’s take the following class as the basis:
public partial class MyClass
{
public string Property1 {get; set;}
public string Property2 {get; set;}
public string Property3 {get; set;}
}
then we would have to do the following in a separate file:
[MetadataType(typeof(MyMetaData))]
public partial class MyClass
{
}
public class MyMetaData
{
[DataMember(Name = "property_1")]
public string Property1 {get; set;}
[DataMember(Name = "property_2")]
public string Property2 {get; set;}
[DataMember(Name = "property_3")]
public string Property3 {get; set;}
}
despite believing that the above answer has not solved your problem, I hope to have given you a north.
Have you ever tried to make the
Property1
asvirtual
and change the annotation with Overload of the property?– Thiago Lunardi