3
I have a website that I have transported from Centos to Freebsd using rsync + mysqldump. Centos + Apache ran normal on Freebsd + Nginx gave this error:
I believe it is related to this code that "converts" f086 into an icon.
#primary_nav #nav_app_forums a:before {
content: "\f086";
}
Instead of the icons appearing "blocks", I am using IP.Board 3.4.6 with the theme Dispersion and Promenu.
Does anyone have any idea how to solve?
Thank you.
Are you sure the Font Awesome CSS is being imported to the page?
– Rafael Almeida
Yes, no bugs on the Chrome console and checked the paths.
– sistematico
To make a Font Awesome icon appear, you need to put the classes in a tag i, thus:
<i class="fa fa-bed"></i>
. Being fa-bed the class of the desired icon. See if this solves your problem. If you do not want to usei
, you will need to copy all class propertiesfa
and the icon class for your CSS rule.– Rafael Almeida
Actually I didn’t edit any code, it’s all from IP.Board and Promenu: https://www.invisionpower.com/apps/board/ http:/community.invisionpower.com/files/file/5435-promenu-basic/ the strange thing is that it worked normal in Centos.
– sistematico
Apparently the source of the Font Awesome. Check that the source files have been migrated correctly, not corrupted and everything else. Also test by changing the CSS to use elsewhere, like this:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.3.0/css/font-awesome.min.css">
– Bruno César
Still the same mistake.
– sistematico
You can inspect the element using the browser developer tools and see the source that is actually being used in these squares?
– vinibrsl
Any error appears in the console when opening the page?
– Guilherme Nascimento
No error appeared on the console no. This question is a little old, unfortunately I do not have the site anymore...
– sistematico
I voted to close that question as non-reproducible. The text of the question does not have enough information to know what is the cause of the problem or reproduce it, since there are numerous possible causes. The author of the question (@systematics) no longer has the site because the question is old. In this way, attempts to produce an answer (such as mine or the two deleted answers) will be guesswork attempts that cannot be ascertained. Therefore, there is no way to give a correct answer to this question, only kicks, and so I am voting for closure.
– Victor Stafusa