I was going to open up a similar topic so I’ll leave my opinion here.
This depends a lot on the frameworks involved.
Jquery + Angular: Not a good practice
The angular is a reactive framework. Internally it uses a timeout that looks at the scope variables. Whenever something changes it updates the page with the content. You do not access the DOM directly and use the concept single page which greatly improves application performance.
The jquery has a totally different approach. It uses DOM access to retrieve and set information. This access is not recommended due to loss of application performance. I’m not going to get into the merits of how it works because I’d be dealing with a topic that’s not on topic.
React + Jquery: Not a good practice
The React is a template-oriented framework. It also has the concept of single page and is reactive as the angular. I do not consider it a good practice precisely because the framework itself already has everything you need. Besides, it’s lighter than angular because its core is smaller. So it doesn’t make sense to include another js framework to do something that React already does.
React + Angular: Not a good practice
Even though both are reactive and using concept single page the structure and way of development is different. Mixing both can generate a fruit salad that will more confuse than help. Remember that development with angular is particularly faster and has more features. However the React is lighter besides being used and maintained by facebook. Nor do I need to go deeper to state that it is also a good option.
In short
These are some of the leading frameworks available in the market. Those I mentioned are widely used in the front-end community, have good documentation with several examples available on the net. So there’s no reason to use more than one.
I know how the IT market works. Pressure for deliveries and etc. More changing the course of the project because someone does not know of the resource used is a team problem. If you are a programmer you have an obligation to know all the technologies used by the team precisely to not have this kind of problem. Now if it is a bean with rice and the company accepts it is because the company is not focused on the quality of source code and later on the quality of the project for the customer.
Thank you for your reply, very clear. Zepto, and Leaflet did not know about them.
– Giancarlo Abel Giulian
@Giancarlogiulian Just adding, Angular makes use of jQuery. Along with Angular, comes a lib called jQueryLite, which is a reduced version of jQuery. If in your HTML you include the full jQuery before Angular, Angular will make use of full jQuery instead of jQueryLite.
– Vinícius Gobbo A. de Oliveira
Interesting @Viníciusgobboa.deOliveira
– Giancarlo Abel Giulian
Well put, @Viníciusgobboa.deOliveira. I’m not particularly an Angular user and I don’t know much about it. In the case of frameworks I prefer Ember or, depending on the project, something more "light" like Backbone (which also uses jQuery as one of its dependencies).
– Rafael Beckel
Excellent discussion, was going through the same "dilemma" but after some research I saw that each has its specific use, and well separated as framework and lib... richer applications for users..
– h3nr1ke