0
I have some friends who have certifications on certain technologies(Microsoft, Oracle, etc), but if you propose a challenge using the technologies they supposedly have knowledge can not develop, however I know people who have no certificate and can naturally solve this challenge.
What I’m trying to say is: What is the weight of a certification X technical and practical knowledge?
Many people when they go to give some proof of certificate decorate the questions and answers, because they know that the evidence is outdated.
How to evaluate a person and how much knowledge does he have of a certain subject? Are there established methodologies for this? For companies, what this affects?
This question is obviously opinionated and still induces the answers. The Certification is a differential, proves that you spent time preparing and is focused. The purpose of certification is not to compensate for years of experience, it is to complete this experience. Good certifications go into technical details that often go unnoticed for someone with years of experience; you have to study specifically for that certification. Certification enriches, such as a good degree or post. Certification is not indicative of experience, and experience does not replace certification. Have both.
– Anthony Accioly