In this scenario, it is feasible to use more than one context?
Yes, it is both feasible and recommended for some cases, where it is not interesting the visibility of all entities in a given context.
For example, in ASP.NET Identity, you usually use a context separate from the rest of the application.
I may end up having problems with relationships and data access?
Can. For example, if you make two selections in different contexts and relate the entities in some way (as in the case where you want to create associative records from n to n), there may be inconsistencies because the context saved can understand the object of the other context as being a new object, which does not yet exist, generating even duplications of data.
There is a particular reason to use multiple contexts in a single database?
As already mentioned above, in a logins authentication and validation scenario is a classic scenario for this separation.
Another reason may be speed. Contexts with many records can impair the performance of the application. In this case, two instances of the same context are used, one reading only and the other for persistence, with different properties configurations.
Just as a response recommendation, try to focus your answer more on technical questions, and a little less on personal experiences, which can create an air based on opinions, which is something the site seeks to avoid. Not that personal experience cannot and should not be mentioned, but try to write a slightly larger response with a slightly denser technical basis. In experience this ensures more upvotes and the answer becomes more interesting ;)
– Leonel Sanches da Silva
Legal @Ciganomorrisonmendez , thanks for your comment without technical questions, if you want to edit it feel free to
– Lucas Roselli