Dude if you want total control it would not be prudent to deposit all your chips in a Framework (FW), whatever it is, even more the Bootstrap 4 (BS4 is the current version).
BS4 has no advanced treatments for 4k resolutions, nor for retina display, let alone for smart watches like Apple Watche. Then consider carefully what the customer wants and what you will do to address the problem. Or if you will generate another problem with a website that will not look cool on 4K TV that he will use in the store for example.
BS 4 also cannot handle images with srcset
, This is actually in HTML, but even in CSS it doesn’t suggest using media queries to treat image size for smaller or larger screens, it simply suggests using width:100%
what is very shallow near the full power of treatments one has with pure CSS. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Aprender/HTML/Multimedia_and_embedding/Responsive_images
Positives:
The advantages of BS 4 is having a grid in flex
, use measures in REM and currently presented a solution for Responsive Typography, but nothing you can not do at hand. https://blog.getbootstrap.com/2019/02/11/bootstrap-4-3-0/#Introducing-Responsive-font-Sizes
Regardless of time to do, budget value, you need to know how to walk without crutches! Summarizing the basics of CSS is indispensable and relying on Framework is a big mistake
responsiveness, thanks for correcting, I just edited.
– Arthur Abitante
If you have time to learn all the responsiveness logic from scratch in CSS, it would be nice if you could use your own solutions. Now if you already know how to use CSS the basics and want some solution quickly, you can invest in Bootstrap.
– Markus Lima
Learn flex display and display grid and be 100% happy easily creating any pure CSS site !
– João Pedro Ribeiro
This does not answer the question. When you have reputation enough, you’ll be able to leave comments on any post but until then, write only answer that no depend on more information of who asked. - Of Revision
– Augusto Vasques