-1
Guys, I have a question, and I’m not finding anything on the internet, I’m making an application for a client and I’m using firebase, for being a google server I believe it will withstand the high volume of users, can anyone confirm to me if firebase really can handle a large volume of users? (we will use the Blaze version) , we believe the volume should be around 2,000 active users simultaneously because it is an app for an anime site that is already well known
1
Firebase has several services, if you are referring to the Realtime Database, real-time database service, according to such plan information.
Spark Plan (Free): Up to 100 simultaneous connections
Flame Plan: Up to 100,000 simultaneous connections
Blaze Plan: Up to 100,000 simultaneous connections per bank
So surely firebase would not have any problem to handle 2000 concurrent users. But I don’t think it’s a number to worry about right now if you haven’t launched your app, because it’s hard for an app to reach that brand quickly.
Edit:
Regarding the boundaries of the Firestore, this link has more information of the limits. And on the simultaneous connections is cited:
Maximum simultaneous connections for customers on mobile/web devices per database - 1,000,000
I was referring to the firestore, I know q a newly released app n has this number of users, but they are from a relatively well-known site and they expect q most of their users use the app, will the firestore withstand this volume of requests?
@Hiranjúnior as for the firestore, also will not have problems with certainty. This link https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/quotasquotes 'Maximum simultaneous connections for clients on mobile/web devices per database - 1,000,000'
Thank you! I’ll look right now
@Hiranjúnior if you answered your question, mark the answer as accepted :)
Browser other questions tagged firebase flutter
You are not signed in. Login or sign up in order to post.
I doubt it has 2000 active users simultaneously, people have illusions about it. Very rare sites that have this, but if you have it would be better a more experienced team deal with it, ñ is having to do with random people on the internet that will make it work.
– Maniero
the question was not that '-' was whether the firebase can handle the volume of users or not, read again and rephrase your answer, thank you :)
– Hiran Júnior
@Hiranjúnior Honestly I found your question a little outside the scope, the staff here takes advantage of the space to solve specific problems with the greater focus on timing problem solving programming, your question could be answered by reading the Firebase documentation.
– Mr_Ghost
@Mr_ghost most of the questions you have here can be solved by reading the documentation, the problem is that sometimes the understanding becomes vague, as is the case of the firebase, I n understood well the limits that it reaches :) if you do not want to answer, or you do not have to answer n precise ue, Just pass on to the next question, have a good afternoon, and I didn’t mean to be rude in my message if it looked like this.
– Hiran Júnior
@Mr_ghost agree, but it is not leaving filling negativity (-1) the questions of new users, or with answers that puts in doubt their development capacity, that will make Sopt improve. A lot of people have prejudice with the site so (although I disagree with those who think so).
– Julio Henrique Bitencourt
Julio Henrique Until today I have not left any negative vote, for me there has to be a great reason for this, I leave my like to you because I believe that we are in the same line of thought. @Hiranjúnior just expressed my opinion giving a touch of how I think the people here face the questions, in order to help always.
– Mr_Ghost