Unstructured boundary notation when it is in an exponent

Asked

Viewed 27 times

1

I’m having a hard time getting the function lim_{x to infty} to stay in the structured exponent so that {x to infty} is below and not on the 'Lim' side. This only happens when I limit the exponent.

inserir a descrição da imagem aqui

e ^ { \lim_{x \to + \infty} \left(  { \ln \left( \dfrac{2x +3 }{2x + 1} \right) \  \cdot   \ x } \right)  }

The result is strange and difficult to understand.

(When you’re normal Remembering that it doesn’t happen When you’re on top- )

inserir a descrição da imagem aqui

\lim_{x \to + \infty}  \left( e ^ { \ln \left( \dfrac{2x +3 }{2x + 1} \right) \  \cdot   \ x } \right)

1 answer

2


Use \limits shortly after \lim:

e^{ \lim\limits_{x \to + \infty} \left( { \ln \left( \dfrac{2x +3 }{2x + 1} \right) \cdot   \ x } \right) }

inserir a descrição da imagem aqui

Particularly, when the exponent is complicated like this, I prefer to use the notation \exp, but it’s all about style anyway:

\exp \left( \lim_{x \to + \infty} { \ln \left( \dfrac{2x +3 }{2x + 1} \right) \  \cdot   \ x } \right) }

inserir a descrição da imagem aqui

  • Even valeuzão, in the hurry had even forgotten that could use the Exp is a good alternative

  • It’s great to know that my response has helped you in some way. So consider vote and accept the answer, so that in the future other people who experience the same problem have a reference to solve it.

Browser other questions tagged

You are not signed in. Login or sign up in order to post.