Published iOS, Rejected: Guideline 2.3.3 - Performance - Accurate Metadata

Asked

Viewed 224 times

0

Guys, I’m with this rejection of iTunes

Apple

  1. 3 Performance: Accurate Metadata
  2. 3 Design: Spam and Spam

but from what I understand are the prints I added, the app is just a link to the site, there is no secret or complexity on top of it. Has anyone ever had this rejection? Can you shed some light on it?

1 answer

2


As you said yourself, your app is "just a link to the site".

According to the guidelines:

Your app should include Features, content, and UI that Elevate it Beyond a repackaged website. If your app is not particularly Useful, Unique, or "app-like," it doesn’t Belong on the App Store. If your App doesn’t provide some Sort of lasting entertainment value, or is just Plain creepy, it may not be accepted. Apps that are Simply a Song or Movie should be submitted to the iTunes store. Apps that are Simply a book or game guide should be submitted to the iBooks Store.

In short, your app should contain features, content and UI that differentiate it from a simple website. If your app is not useful, it should not belong to the App Store.


Ask yourself: what’s the difference between the user downloading your app or manually creating a shortcut on the home screen?

  • I get it, even worse I tried to "trick" him with a splash screen, and yet he slashes the app. I posted the same on android and it worked, I thought Apple would also accept. The way is to guide the user to add the page link, but it is something that is not intuitive for ordinary users, so the app suggestion that is easier for the user to understand. Thank you very much, apple is a new platform for me.

Browser other questions tagged

You are not signed in. Login or sign up in order to post.