3
It is not enough to be neither a technical doubt, but if someone has some light of the layout used by the VIVO Company in the archives.
On the website of Febraban itself has a layout, but it is not respected:
https://www.febraban.org.br/Acervo1.asp?id_texto=201&id_pagina=173&palavra=
In my web searches many people have problems with these files.
In case there is no layout someone knows where I can hit the data and found 'in the eye' what is what?
This image is an example of how this is defined in the layout provided by Febraban
But face the file I received omits the unique identifier and reverses various positions
000000000000120160607VIVO S/A CE CEXXXXXXXXX CXXXX DE AXX DOS FXXX DO XXXXXXXX 05810000000103 2058747458 052016 2016052820160508
Dear, is a positional file right? Is it not respected? could you give us more details? Your question is yes interesting!
– Mateus
I added the image for the Header and the Header line I received. Only this is for all lines :/
– Krismorte
I also had problems with this format. In the Service Item (04), it is not according to layout. The type 0 Header, and the 1 Account summary, I had no problems, the version of the layout I use is the year 2000, version 2!
– Luiz Augusto
@Luizaugusto has how you pass me the information of this layout that you use.
– Krismorte
This problem is already very old. The phone companies - not only Vivo - do not respect this standard. And it seems that there is no point to complain...
– Reginaldo Luciano De Araujo