0
I have these two tables in the bank
cadcha (Cadastro de chamadas)
cadram (Cadastro de ramal)
All calls made in a particular company will be saved in this table cadcha
. The destination extension field, is the extension that answered or performed this respective call. I also have a second table, called cadram
, where the branch register is performed manually, and the system reports are generated from this table cadram. I would like to implement a protocol that when triggered, registers the extensions found in the field richness table cadcha on the table cadram (Obviously the extensions that have not yet registered). Example:
We have there in the table cadcha the extension 4554, But in the cadram table we don’t have this extension yet. I would like the past to realize this.
What I got so far:
SELECT returns all links extensions that have not yet been registered:
SELECT DISTINCT (RAMALDESTINO)
FROM CADCHA
WHERE RAMALDESTINO
NOT IN
(SELECT RAMCOD FROM CADRAM)
The scope of the trial, which is the part where I couldn’t go through with it: Note: In Firebird procedures it is mandatory to pass a value per parameter and return something?
CREATE PROCEDURE SP_CADRAM_AUTOMATICO
(
teste VARCHAR(1)
)
RETURNS
(
EXCEPTION "Procedure Acionada"
)
AS
BEGIN
FOR
SELECT DISTINCT (RAMALDESTINO)
FROM CADCHA
WHERE RAMALDESTINO
NOT IN
(SELECT RAMCOD FROM CADRAM)
DO
BEGIN
INSERT INTO CADCHA (RAMCOD, RAMDES) VALUES (RAMALDESTINO, 'RAMAL');
END
END
Reinforcing: I need the trial to register the extensions in the table automatically for me, using as a basis the table of links (cadcha) in the field ramaldestino.
Make a script to currently pollute the cadcha, and then it would be better to have a TRIGGER AFTER INSERT linked to the cadcha table.
– David
The problem with Rigger is that it would slow down the system, as some customers make several calls per minute that are charged in real time on the cadcha table. So I opted for the Precedent, but I realized that her syntax is different from Rigger, which does not happen in some.
– antunesleo_
I understand, but then it wouldn’t be "automatic", as you think of performing this procedure?
– David
The automatic I say would be on the part of not having to register the extensions manually one by one. The idea is to have a "Update extensions" button that will call this application.
– antunesleo_