Since you did not provide sample data and expected result, just for fun I propose this example to give a hint on how to achieve this using the function STUFF()
CREATE TABLE Teachers
(
  TeacherID INT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
  TeacherName VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL
);
CREATE TABLE Classes
(
  ClassID INT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
  Class VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL,
  MainTeacher INT NOT NULL,
  CONSTRAINT FK_Classes_MainTeacher FOREIGN KEY (MainTeacher) REFERENCES Teachers (TeacherID)
);
INSERT INTO Teachers (TeacherID, TeacherName) VALUES
(1, 'Teacher1'),
(2, 'Teacher2');
INSERT INTO Classes (ClassID, Class, MainTeacher) VALUES
(1, 'Class1', 1),
(2, 'Class2', 1),
(3, 'Class3', 2);
SELECT T.*,
       STUFF(
               (
                 SELECT DISTINCT ',' + Class
                 FROM Classes C
                 WHERE C.MainTeacher = T.TeacherID
                 FOR XML PATH('')
               ), 1, 1, ''
            ) ControlledClasses
FROM Teachers T ;
Results:
+-----------+-------------+-------------------+
| TeacherID | TeacherName | ControlledClasses |
+-----------+-------------+-------------------+
|         1 | Teacher1    | Class1,Class2     |
|         2 | Teacher2    | Class3            |
+-----------+-------------+-------------------+
Here’s a live demo
db<>fiddle demo
							
							
						 
And what would be the desired result? If the ratio is 1:N, how do you want the answer?
– Woss
I need you to show only 1 time the Itemid Account is not relevant to my query.
– Eduardo Duude
What the
distincthas to do with more than 100 fields? If the Itemid field is not relevant, just make aselect distinct conta– maiconfriedel
If the field is not relevant why you included it in the query?
– anonimo
I need all fields of all tables A and B, the main point is the account with the other information.. which are various columns.
– Eduardo Duude
We need DDL, sample data and expected results.
– Ilyes