Maybe there’s two ways to think about it. From what you’re saying, yes, there is.
It’s called object orientation. Something that people say they do, but they totally don’t know what it is, how it applies.
The unique object-oriented mechanism is inheritance, something I’ve virtually never seen anyone do in Windows Forms and where OOP best applies.
You create a control with certain characteristics and whenever you need a similar control that maintains the same characteristics you inherit from this control, so all inherited receive these characteristics. What you probably already know is that this control can, and probably should, inherit from an existing control. And it may be that this new control can be abstract, just to organize. You can let the descending classes change the value or not, which may be a little different than you want.
If you want the change to happen dynamically, and the CSS doesn’t work like that, where you can change on time and automatically transfer to the descendants, then you need a mechanism that does this, probably with events where the descendants sign events from the ascendant, maybe even automatically.
On the other hand it may be speaking not of forms but of controls that are nested within each other. This has nothing ready and usually makes little sense in Winforms and probably in other forms, except something very restricted and specific. In this case the controls that are children of others, ie, are linked within the existing control, something like putting a label or a textbox within a form. The properties of a form are usually different. Even those that are equal have differences motivations, it doesn’t make much sense to want the background color of the form to be automatically replicated in textbox. What you can do is establish transparent color for example in a label and that means that the background color will be the same as the form because it’s not to have a color, it’s not white, or black, it’s colorless, it’s done.
I can’t imagine where Singleton comes into this, by the way, he seems to be the opposite of what he needs. Unless the question is about something else altogether.
The question is very general and the answer was in the same line.